<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Web Hosting Reviews &#187; Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com/category/policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-hostingreview.com</link>
	<description>With Web Hosting News To Taste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment Policy Has Changed</title>
		<link>http://www.web-hostingreview.com/comment-policy-has-changed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web-hostingreview.com/comment-policy-has-changed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-hostingreview.com/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the very inception of Web Hosting Review Blog, I have maintained that the link to the comment author should not have &#8220;nofollow&#8221; attribute. It was my way I could thank those who took their time writing a comment or reviewing a web hosting provider. Unfortunately this approach can backfire. Not only it is an [...]<p>Post from <a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com">Web Hosting Review Blog:</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com/comment-policy-has-changed/">Comment Policy Has Changed</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the very inception of Web Hosting Review Blog, I have maintained that the link to the comment author should not have &#8220;nofollow&#8221; attribute. It was my way I could thank those who took their time writing a comment or reviewing a web hosting provider. Unfortunately this approach can backfire. Not only it is an open invitation to &#8220;spambots&#8221; but to human generated spam due to the fact that this blog is listed in the number of &#8220;no-nofollow blogs&#8221; directories. In recent weeks the number of comments that were aimed at <strike>exploring</strike> abusing possible SEO benefits has more than quadrupled. While I was tempted to oust and ridicule a few as an example, I will just say this. You know who you are, so please behave from now on.</p>
<p><strong>Back To Nofollow.</strong></p>
<p>In the light of increased spam (150+ daily) I have decided to revert to use nofollow attribute in the comments from now on. If you are discouraged by this do not be, there is still a good chance to get a friendly link from me. If you leave a relevant comment, even if you choose to respectfully (respectfully is the key word) disagree with me, I will most certainly take time to visit your blog and website. Those who choose to review a web hosting provider (all of the web hosting provider&#8217;s profiles are filed in Reviews category) will be rewarded with a link in the upcoming &#8220;thank you posts&#8221;- I reserve to use the anchor text of my choosing in those posts. These future &#8220;thank you posts&#8221; is the way to remedy the presence of &#8220;nofollow&#8221; attribute in the comments.</p>
<p><strong>Comments Policy Outline</strong></p>
<p>This comment policy outline will be visible on every post of this blog from now on:</p>
<ul>
<li>This blog is using &#8220;nofollow&#8221; attribute any attempt to spam for SEO benefits is the waste of your time.</li>
<li>If you leave a review of web hosting providers (which is any post listed in the category &#8220;Reviews&#8221;), I may contact you to ask if you prefer a link to your website other than to your main domain.</li>
<li>
Every post comment containing profanity or links to anything illegal will be deleted.</li>
</ul>
<p>Post from <a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com">Web Hosting Review Blog:</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com/comment-policy-has-changed/">Comment Policy Has Changed</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com/help-to-spread-the-word-about-new-rating-system/" rel="bookmark" title="April 24, 2008">Help To Spread The Word About New Rating System</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com/comments-reviews-policy/" rel="bookmark" title="March 30, 2010">The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly &#8211; Your Reviews Are Always Welcomed.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com/changes-going-antisocial-no-more-dofollow/" rel="bookmark" title="March 25, 2008">Changes: Going &#8220;Antisocial&#8221; + no more Dofollow</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com/house-keeping-matters/" rel="bookmark" title="May 12, 2008">Housekeeping Matters- Blog Improvements</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.web-hostingreview.com/your-reviews-may-have-been-lost/" rel="bookmark" title="May 17, 2008">Your Reviews May Have Been Lost</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.859 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web-hostingreview.com/comment-policy-has-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
